One trial jury Samsung and Apple talks about when he decided on the verdict and how it was taken | iDevice.ro
RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Home TV LIVE: Table jailbreak iPhone and iPad App Finder iDevice.ro Forum Rules Glossary FAQ Contact Submit News iPad Tutorials iPhone 2G iPhone 3G iPhone 3GS iPhone 4 iPhone Firmware Customization iTunes Downloads Firmware iPod Touch Pub & Stats
During the night a panel of nine jurors ruled in favor of Apple's case in a lawsuit filed by Samsung, entitling them to those in Cupertino more than $ 1 billion in damages because he has violated Samsung patents. Because it's a process so important, people at CNET were able to talk to one of the jury process and it made a very interesting confession. He said the jury was not unanimous beginning of what Apple should get on the number of terminals that violated the patents, but the first day of deliberations concluded that Samsung violated patents. xperia x10
We found for Apple Because of the evidence They Presented, Ilagan said. "It was clear there was infringement. Well, there were severe. The e-mails back and forth from That Went Samsung execs about the Apple Features That They SHOULD incorporated into Their devices was pretty damning to me. And Also, on the last day, They Showed xperia x10 the pictures of the Samsung phones That Made Before the iPhone cam out and Ones That They made after the iPhone cam out. Some of the Samsung executives They Presented on video [testimony] from Korea - I thought They were dodging the questions. They Did not answer xperia x10 one of Them. Cause Their They Did not help.
As far as it concerns him, he said Samsung emails directors who were discussing ways of copying functions iDevice-sized photos xperia x10 terminals manufactured by Samsung before and after the appearance of iPhone plus testimonials Samsung executives have avoided answer questions lawyers have helped xperia x10 decision-making verdict. Jurors were sometimes heated discussion about the final solution, but in only 21 hours, or about 3 working days, were able to finalize the decision presented last night.
It did not dawn on us [That we AGREED That Samsung had infringed] on the first day. We were debating xperia x10 heavily, Especially about the patents on bounce back and pinch-to-zoom. They said Apple patents owned, BUT we were debating about the Prior Art [about the same technology Samsung That said existed Before the iPhone debuted]. [Velvin Hogan] was jury foreman. He had experience. He himself owned patents. In The Beginning the debate was heated, BUT it was still a civilian. Hogan holds patents, so he took us through HIS experience. After That it was easier. xperia x10 After we debated That first patent - what was Prior Art Because we had a hard time believing there was no Prior Art That Was not there something out there Before Apple. In fact one we Skipped That We Could it go on faster. It was bogging us down.
Juror says the offensive on Samsung's patents infringed by Apple played a role in making the wrong decision xperia x10 because Koreans accusing American compnia. Samsung has licensed the 3G communications technologies Intel, Intel has produced some baseband xperia x10 chips which he sold to Apple through Apple's acquisition acquired the right to use technology so Samsung claims that Apple could not violated in any way a patent.
Finally, the jury remains Experience xperia x10 President, the patent owner, said other jurors process of obtaining such a document, and the other is given. Juror says that after hearing these explanations all things have become much easier and the decision was made much easier. Basically jury knew from a certain part of that Samsung has violated Apple patents in bad faith and all that remained was to determine whether Apple should receive nearly U.S. $ 2.8 billion or less required.
Related articles: jury trial between Apple and Samsung have to answer xperia x10 over 600 questions to give a verdict is what documentation must complete jury trial Apple - Samsung to give Apple and Samsung a verdict not understand the value of their patents , an Australian judge believes the ridiculous one of them as Apple and Samsung start a new process, choosing xperia x10 jurors, some of whom are employees of Google and Samsung cancel one of Apple lawsuits against Apple 8 Comments
The problem is that all there was to clamp Apple "Prior-art" meaning more time
RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Home TV LIVE: Table jailbreak iPhone and iPad App Finder iDevice.ro Forum Rules Glossary FAQ Contact Submit News iPad Tutorials iPhone 2G iPhone 3G iPhone 3GS iPhone 4 iPhone Firmware Customization iTunes Downloads Firmware iPod Touch Pub & Stats
During the night a panel of nine jurors ruled in favor of Apple's case in a lawsuit filed by Samsung, entitling them to those in Cupertino more than $ 1 billion in damages because he has violated Samsung patents. Because it's a process so important, people at CNET were able to talk to one of the jury process and it made a very interesting confession. He said the jury was not unanimous beginning of what Apple should get on the number of terminals that violated the patents, but the first day of deliberations concluded that Samsung violated patents. xperia x10
We found for Apple Because of the evidence They Presented, Ilagan said. "It was clear there was infringement. Well, there were severe. The e-mails back and forth from That Went Samsung execs about the Apple Features That They SHOULD incorporated into Their devices was pretty damning to me. And Also, on the last day, They Showed xperia x10 the pictures of the Samsung phones That Made Before the iPhone cam out and Ones That They made after the iPhone cam out. Some of the Samsung executives They Presented on video [testimony] from Korea - I thought They were dodging the questions. They Did not answer xperia x10 one of Them. Cause Their They Did not help.
As far as it concerns him, he said Samsung emails directors who were discussing ways of copying functions iDevice-sized photos xperia x10 terminals manufactured by Samsung before and after the appearance of iPhone plus testimonials Samsung executives have avoided answer questions lawyers have helped xperia x10 decision-making verdict. Jurors were sometimes heated discussion about the final solution, but in only 21 hours, or about 3 working days, were able to finalize the decision presented last night.
It did not dawn on us [That we AGREED That Samsung had infringed] on the first day. We were debating xperia x10 heavily, Especially about the patents on bounce back and pinch-to-zoom. They said Apple patents owned, BUT we were debating about the Prior Art [about the same technology Samsung That said existed Before the iPhone debuted]. [Velvin Hogan] was jury foreman. He had experience. He himself owned patents. In The Beginning the debate was heated, BUT it was still a civilian. Hogan holds patents, so he took us through HIS experience. After That it was easier. xperia x10 After we debated That first patent - what was Prior Art Because we had a hard time believing there was no Prior Art That Was not there something out there Before Apple. In fact one we Skipped That We Could it go on faster. It was bogging us down.
Juror says the offensive on Samsung's patents infringed by Apple played a role in making the wrong decision xperia x10 because Koreans accusing American compnia. Samsung has licensed the 3G communications technologies Intel, Intel has produced some baseband xperia x10 chips which he sold to Apple through Apple's acquisition acquired the right to use technology so Samsung claims that Apple could not violated in any way a patent.
Finally, the jury remains Experience xperia x10 President, the patent owner, said other jurors process of obtaining such a document, and the other is given. Juror says that after hearing these explanations all things have become much easier and the decision was made much easier. Basically jury knew from a certain part of that Samsung has violated Apple patents in bad faith and all that remained was to determine whether Apple should receive nearly U.S. $ 2.8 billion or less required.
Related articles: jury trial between Apple and Samsung have to answer xperia x10 over 600 questions to give a verdict is what documentation must complete jury trial Apple - Samsung to give Apple and Samsung a verdict not understand the value of their patents , an Australian judge believes the ridiculous one of them as Apple and Samsung start a new process, choosing xperia x10 jurors, some of whom are employees of Google and Samsung cancel one of Apple lawsuits against Apple 8 Comments
The problem is that all there was to clamp Apple "Prior-art" meaning more time
No comments:
Post a Comment